I came across the idea of 'enoughness' recently, when talking with a colleague who studied sociology with Ian Hughes at the Australian National University (ANU) some years ago. Apparently Hughes (who was an anthropologist & sociologist - odd mix I know) did some work in Papua New Guinea, where he came across this concept.*
In a particular community he visited there, people actually lived the concept of enoughness. They had an idea of how much was enough - enough to see them through with a little extra for a slow year - and then stopped accumulating more. Instead they moved to putting their energy into cultural improvement - creating, adding to their culture.
Last year for my Blog Action Day post, I wrote about consumerism, and my efforts to avoid the indoctrination of my children with the materialist ethic of our culture. Blog Action Day last year was about the environment. This year it's about poverty, but I find myself writing about almost the same subject.
Imagine if everyone in Australia had, and practiced, the concept of enoughness. Instead of constantly wanting more, we could say, that's enough - and then give of ourselves to our community. There wouldn't be any unemployment, because people would be working less. Community organisations wouldn't be struggling for lack of volunteers, because people would have plenty of time to give back - helping out at a soup kitchen or running a protest rally or listening to kids read at school or whatever.
I struggle personally with this concept all the time. I am as materialistic as the next person, and though I try to resist it, I often fail. And I don't mean that I just fail to avoid consuming. What I mean is that I fail to avoid wanting. You may say there's nothing wrong with wanting, if you are able to avoid acting on the want. Sure - it's our actions we are responsible for, not our emotions. There's something to that, but I'd sure like to be able to overcome the emotion too. To figure out exactly what it is that drives the want, and to beat it.
But back to enoughness. How do we know when something is enough? At the moment, Chris and I both work part-time, so that one of us is (almost) always home with Mikaela (and Liam after school). Of course, we always feel that we are struggling a bit with money as a result, but really we're not. We just can't buy the things we want.
Things like a bigger hard drive so we can put all our music into iTunes and onto our iPod. We don't need that but we really want it. Things like a bike for Chris so he could ride with Liam, and maybe even work up to riding to work (we both usually take the bus at the moment). Hey, maybe even a bike for me. Of course there's also non-material consuming like dinners out or going to see a movie (either of which we can really afford to do *occasionally* anyway).
And then there's the really big one: things like a bigger house (with a bedroom for each of the (planned) kids, and maybe even a study as well), with a bigger yard. Why do we feel we need that? Because it's what most of our friends have, or at the very least expect to have within the next few years. We have bedroom for each of the kids at the moment if we give up the study. But we are hoping to have another kid (isn't two enough? I hear you ask), so then two kids will have to share *and* we'll have to give up the study.
But you know what? So what? Kids share all the time. We could put the computer in a corner of our bedroom. But I grew up with my own room from the age of six (when my Dad moved out and I got the study!), most of Liam's friends have their own rooms (or will have within a few years, base on their parents intentions), and well... it seems good. I mean, really.
For Liam and his friends to be able to go build lego in Liam's room is really good at the moment, because Mikaela wants to follow Liam everywhere, but she just is not fun for him to have around when he's trying to build lego space ships. At the moment Kaely is still in our room (and we're still in the study!), but that can't last if we have another baby. So yeah, I would love to have another bedroom so they could each have their own.
But if I gave up on that plan? I would suddenly feel immeasurably richer. And then the presure to work more would diminish a little. And if I could give up on all the other wants, the pressure to work more would diminish a whole lot.
The blog action day theme is poverty, and here I am talking about my own richness and desire for more. But what I'm really thinking is that if everyone who had as much as I do (or more), stopped, if we all said "that's enough", and started using the rest of our time and money to contribute - be it by writing a book, painting a painting, planting trees, or continuing in our seventy-hour-a-week jobs but donating our excess income to helping people who don't have enough - well, I wonder how long it would take to eliminate poverty around the world?
_________
* A google search hasn't turned up any information, so I'm not entirely sure of my facts here, but for the purposes of this blog post it doesn't really matter.
Recent Comments